关于贝克休斯 INTEQ
#3
NorSeaForest
发表于 03-09-2011 - 09:58
精准.石油.论坛 forum.petro-china.com
引用框(ytlee @ 03-08-2011 - 10:15)
ytlee,thank you very much.I really gain a lot from your share in this forum.
----
来源: 精准石油论坛 - 推进信息共享,提升科技水平
#5
#6
shadow9451
发表于 03-14-2011 - 23:37
精准.石油.论坛 forum.petro-china.com
现在INTEQ和Atlas已经合并了
新的部门处理general geoscience的服务和问题
Office工作的大部分是研发和Reliability Engineer
大部分应该是上井的Field Speacialist
美国这边以Onshore Shale Gas为主
----
来源: 精准石油论坛 - 推进信息共享,提升科技水平
#7
yuzexi
发表于 03-19-2011 - 19:58
精准.石油.论坛 forum.petro-china.com
----
来源: 精准石油论坛 - 推进信息共享,提升科技水平
#8
NorSeaForest
发表于 03-20-2011 - 09:27
精准.石油.论坛 forum.petro-china.com
引用框(shadow9451 @ 03-14-2011 - 23:37)
现在INTEQ和Atlas已经合并了
新的部门处理general geoscience的服务和问题
Office工作的大部分是研发和Reliability Engineer
大部分应该是上井的Field Speacialist
美国这边以Onshore Shale Gas为主
谢谢了!前人种树后人乘凉!非常感谢!
----
来源: 精准石油论坛 - 推进信息共享,提升科技水平
#9
NorSeaForest
发表于 03-20-2011 - 09:32
精准.石油.论坛 forum.petro-china.com
引用框(yuzexi @ 03-19-2011 - 19:58)
首先谢谢前辈,谢谢您详细的解答。然后我还想问一下,您对从FE向设计转型这条路怎么看呢,这样的案例多吗?我想最初的几年我可能会出海,我得挣海贴改变一下家里的条件,也许过后我想向设计方面转型,您觉得这条路的可操作性大吗。祝您一帆风顺啊!
----
来源: 精准石油论坛 - 推进信息共享,提升科技水平
#10
yuzexi
发表于 03-20-2011 - 17:56
精准.石油.论坛 forum.petro-china.com
引用框(NorSeaForest @ 03-20-2011 - 09:32)
引用框(yuzexi @ 03-19-2011 - 19:58)
首先谢谢前辈,谢谢您详细的解答。然后我还想问一下,您对从FE向设计转型这条路怎么看呢,这样的案例多吗?我想最初的几年我可能会出海,我得挣海贴改变一下家里的条件,也许过后我想向设计方面转型,您觉得这条路的可操作性大吗。祝您一帆风顺啊!
从去年开始,进入公司的应届毕业生除了geoscience以外的productline呢都会进入一个EDP计划中,也就是(field)Engineer Development program,这个计划走三年时间,每个productline具体的安排不一样,入职后有相关培训,到时候你肯定会慢慢了解到的。大致就是说,这三年时间从现场培养慢慢走到办公室的角色了。
----
来源: 精准石油论坛 - 推进信息共享,提升科技水平
#11
NorSeaForest
发表于 03-20-2011 - 21:56
精准.石油.论坛 forum.petro-china.com
引用框(yuzexi @ 03-20-2011 - 17:56)
引用框(NorSeaForest @ 03-20-2011 - 09:32)
引用框(yuzexi @ 03-19-2011 - 19:58)
首先谢谢前辈,谢谢您详细的解答。然后我还想问一下,您对从FE向设计转型这条路怎么看呢,这样的案例多吗?我想最初的几年我可能会出海,我得挣海贴改变一下家里的条件,也许过后我想向设计方面转型,您觉得这条路的可操作性大吗。祝您一帆风顺啊!
从去年开始,进入公司的应届毕业生除了geoscience以外的productline呢都会进入一个EDP计划中,也就是(field)Engineer Development program,这个计划走三年时间,每个productline具体的安排不一样,入职后有相关培训,到时候你肯定会慢慢了解到的。大致就是说,这三年时间从现场培养慢慢走到办公室的角色了。
非常感谢!
----
来源: 精准石油论坛 - 推进信息共享,提升科技水平
#12
shadow9451
发表于 03-21-2011 - 23:13
精准.石油.论坛 forum.petro-china.com
For Engineering, especially FE and FS, you will see lots of BS or BE fresh-outs get hired. Because they are young, energetic, no engagement to family yet, can stay in nowhere for months... Those are all the companies are happy to see. However, you need to think what about 5 or 10 years later? What about the day you are tired of the field and you want to settle down with someone? You may have been told you can switch to R&D...Come on, You really think a BS/BE can do so called 'Research'? Maintain, Marketing & Sales, HR etc can only take about 30% of the 'retiring' FE/FS. So how about the other 70%? Well, some of them might have left, most of them will be laid off... Sadly but...TRUE.
So. My sincere advice will be:
If you are young and get a field job, go for it! Earn the bonus, save your money!
5 years later, apply a Ph.D program in Petroleum Engineering in US. When you graduate, you will be having practical experience plus advanced degree, then it will easy to get a research position in the super majors, which is relatively stable and well paid.
Good Luck!
----
来源: 精准石油论坛 - 推进信息共享,提升科技水平
#13
ytlee
发表于 03-21-2011 - 23:53
精准.石油.论坛 forum.petro-china.com
引用
Yes.
On the other hand, do you really think research only limited to those with sheepskin?
Look around big blue or big red, there are tons of PhDs in both companies, look closer at their boss or team leaders, a group of old men, some with MBAs and at least half dozen I know did not finish college or don't have college degree.
For research, what really matter is desire, passion and drive.
----
来源: 精准石油论坛 - 推进信息共享,提升科技水平
#14
shadow9451
发表于 03-22-2011 - 21:44
精准.石油.论坛 forum.petro-china.com
I agree that diploma does not necessarily mean everything, but most times it will be the stepping stone.
----
来源: 精准石油论坛 - 推进信息共享,提升科技水平
#16
ytlee
发表于 03-22-2011 - 22:28
精准.石油.论坛 forum.petro-china.com
引用框(shadow9451 @ 03-22-2011 - 08:46)
if sheepskin is not that important, why every professor in Top U is holding a Ph.D degree?
I guess your statement implies that professors know best and universities hold the most advance knowledge.
If you believe that, I have ocean front properties in Arizona.
In US especially deepwater GoM, we may outsource long term low priority R/D projects to universities. While the guys with square hats may be doing the job, the guys who pull the strings may be a Joe Sixpack. The more urgent projects are for service vendors.
The recent shale play break thru (ie frac & slick water) were fruits of trial & error from the field hands. The service vendors were the lucky keepers of the receipts. Only recently, they tried to associate the field technology with the science. They take in more recent grads than majors. (Due to cut back, majors curtail their RD departments in the 80s, 90s and 2K. There are signs that the trend may be reversing. The majors took in a lot of PhDs in 2006-2008, but not many after 2008). Only time will tell, does these new hats can advance the technology.
BTW, the statement of "every professor in Top U is holding a Ph.D degree" is incorrect, especially in poltical science. If you have done your homework, you would find some chinese/russian former political refugee taught in Harvard. And if you have be a TA or know a friend who is a TA, you should know that PhD is not a requirement for giving lectures.
----
来源: 精准石油论坛 - 推进信息共享,提升科技水平
#18
shadow9451
发表于 03-23-2011 - 03:01
精准.石油.论坛 forum.petro-china.com
如果在国内,我觉得就没必要读了,还不如多积累点工作经验。
如果在美国,很少有公司会愿意雇佣既没有绿卡又没有美国学位的中国大学生(中国的MS这边并不承认),哪怕你有多年的国内工作经验。
一家之言,大家仅供参考,呵呵
BTW,不谈政治,不当小将,但BS柴玲,吾尔开西之流!
----
来源: 精准石油论坛 - 推进信息共享,提升科技水平

登录
注册
帮助


多重回复