第一页
带板计算?
#2
Paul
发表于 02-06-2008 - 11:35
精准.石油.论坛 forum.petro-china.com
What we are using is base on ABS MODU 3-2-1.9.1
Effective Flange Area
The required section modulus of members such as girders, webs, etc., supporting frames and
stiffeners is to be obtained on an effective width of plating basis in accordance with the
following criteria. The section is to include the structural member in association with an
effective width of plating not exceeding one-half the sum of spacing on each side of the
member or 33% of the unsupported span l, whichever is less. For girders and webs along hatch openings, an effective breadth of plating not exceeding one-half the spacing or 16.5% of
the unsupported span l, whichever is less, is to be used. The required section modulus of
frames and stiffeners is assumed to be provided by the stiffener and a maximum of one frame
space of the plating to which it is attached.
Which rule mentioned 42t? I know somebody choosed max. 60t considered the effective plate buckling.
Please discuss.
精准.石油.论坛 forum.petro-china.comEffective Flange Area
The required section modulus of members such as girders, webs, etc., supporting frames and
stiffeners is to be obtained on an effective width of plating basis in accordance with the
following criteria. The section is to include the structural member in association with an
effective width of plating not exceeding one-half the sum of spacing on each side of the
member or 33% of the unsupported span l, whichever is less. For girders and webs along hatch openings, an effective breadth of plating not exceeding one-half the spacing or 16.5% of
the unsupported span l, whichever is less, is to be used. The required section modulus of
frames and stiffeners is assumed to be provided by the stiffener and a maximum of one frame
space of the plating to which it is attached.
Which rule mentioned 42t? I know somebody choosed max. 60t considered the effective plate buckling.
Please discuss.
----
来源: 精准石油论坛 - 推进信息共享,提升科技水平
#3
houston heat dragon boat club
发表于 02-06-2008 - 21:30
精准.石油.论坛 forum.petro-china.com
thank you Paul.
that was what I use for many years in china.
only because I just come down to houston, and been told for times to use 42 or 43 times of plat thickness, and don't know why.
may be come from onshore or civil?
did any one here see it in green book or API?
thank you for join:)
精准.石油.论坛 forum.petro-china.comthat was what I use for many years in china.
only because I just come down to houston, and been told for times to use 42 or 43 times of plat thickness, and don't know why.
may be come from onshore or civil?
did any one here see it in green book or API?
thank you for join:)
----
来源: 精准石油论坛 - 推进信息共享,提升科技水平
#6
houston heat dragon boat club
发表于 01-28-2010 - 01:58
精准.石油.论坛 forum.petro-china.com
DNV 里有42(235/屈α?^0.5T
----应力是牛吨/毫方
有旱鸭子对板没概念,来了个秀才念半边儿.
除上面外,
腹板是75T
面板是36T
愿与楼主换表格.
:)
----应力是牛吨/毫方
有旱鸭子对板没概念,来了个秀才念半边儿.
除上面外,
腹板是75T
面板是36T
愿与楼主换表格.
:)
靠,你小子换电话也不告述一声,圣诞节CALL 不到,这一年死到哪去了。怎么,想躲我?你小子欠我三张二食堂的细粮票还没还呢, 快三十年了。下个月我要是下岗可没得吃了。
----
来源: 精准石油论坛 - 推进信息共享,提升科技水平
#8
houston heat dragon boat club
发表于 02-05-2010 - 00:58
精准.石油.论坛 forum.petro-china.com
PONTOON那哥们说的是DNV-RP-C201里的,是局部的板稳定性,但我看过的DNV屈服计算表好像有点儿不一样,随然大家都是抄来偷去的。
ABS的就更不一样了。
那位有API 2V, 谢谢你介绍一下,没见过。
再有个事,一直不好意思问同事。用SACS作半潜模型,PONTOON作成一根,能不能算稳定性,是总体还是局部,如果是,按2V吗,如果不是,是模型简单还是软件不包。随然大家都对ANSYS感兴趣,还是只想知道。谢谢了。
精准.石油.论坛 forum.petro-china.comABS的就更不一样了。
那位有API 2V, 谢谢你介绍一下,没见过。
再有个事,一直不好意思问同事。用SACS作半潜模型,PONTOON作成一根,能不能算稳定性,是总体还是局部,如果是,按2V吗,如果不是,是模型简单还是软件不包。随然大家都对ANSYS感兴趣,还是只想知道。谢谢了。
----
来源: 精准石油论坛 - 推进信息共享,提升科技水平
第一页

登录
注册
帮助


多重回复